Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Danish: Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler) is an work by. One of the most noteworthy features of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide is that it lives up to its subtitle.
|Published (Last):||4 May 2007|
|PDF File Size:||17.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This article about a book on metaphysics is a stub.
Also, he was a vehement critic of the Church, fighting its fanatic dogmatism and self-grandiosity. I had a fear and trembling such as perhaps no one else had.
For example, the interest in the paradox that “the eternal truth has come into being in time”, and its relevance to personal responsibility, are properly Hegelian. Unzcientific distinction on which the above “incendiary sentence” pivots — that between subjective and objective concerns as criteria for authenticity — is in fact the key to the argument of the Postscript as a whole. This analysis issues in not only the important reminder cited above but also a clarifying claim that ought really to change the shape of the current debates.
Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the subjective thinker’s relation to the truth of Christianity.
Learn more about Amazon Prime. Volume 2 contains the translators’ and editors’ extensive notes, excerpts from Kierkegaard’s journals relevant to the main text of CUP, and bibliographic and indexing material. Scholars have interpreted Kierkegaard variously as an existentialist, neo-orthodoxist, postmodernist, humanist, and individualist. So it happens that the issue of system versus the Christian faith has been debated more unsdientific a hundred years ago.
Adam rated it it was amazing Sep 01, This individuation of the self, as opposed to externalization of the self in abstractoin the collective, corresponds with Kierkegaard’s insistence on subjectified experience. Lists with This Book. This unecientific another passage that has been misused by proponents of a Kierkegaard divorced from positive content, and Westphal ably corrects their misrepresentation of the text I nonetheless recommend this edition highly.
In this decision-making process – that is almost never about the facts but always about the value – lay elements of objective knowledgeintersubjective axiological truths and subjective emotions provenance. Emil Brunner mentioned Kierkegaard 51 times in his book Man in Revolt and wrote a semi-serious parody of Kierkegaard’s idea of truth as subjectivity by making truth objectivity in Aubrey rated it liked it Jul 07, Against Hegel’s system, Kierkegaard is often interpreted as taking the side unsxientific metaphysical libertarianism or freewillthough it has been argued that poatscript incompatibilist conception of free will is not essential to Kierkegaard’s formulation of existentialism.
He labors to make Kierkegaard as intelligible as possible to those of us who cannot consult unzcientific original, and he is unafraid to recast phrases, and even whole sentences, where this aim demands it.
Like his other pseudonymous works, the Postscript is not a reflection of Kierkegaard’s own beliefs. In this frame of reference, subjectivity can mean different – but not mutually exclusive – things.
Familiar Kierkegaardian themes are introduced in the work, including truth as subjectivity, indirect communication, the leap, kierlegaard the impossibility of forming a philosophical system for human existence. Don’t have a Kindle?
However, this is a difficult text and the notes are detailed and very useful. The Postscript credits “Johannes Climacus” as the author and Kierkegaard as its editor. Subjective truth is essential or ethico-religious truth. postxcript
Share your thoughts with other customers. Any god would do. These puzzles are thick and knotted. Review “The definitive edition of the Writings. The upshot is that the identity of the prayer’s target is not irrelevant to its authenticity; it is simply far less relevant than is the quality of the prayer’s “how”.
By contrast, the passionless Christian is so far kierkebaard fulfilling the task of praying to God that he may be regarded as having utterly flouted it namely, as though he were unscientfiic enthusiast of idolatryeven if he has gotten his prayer’s objective dimension right.
In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the question: There is a point about Hegel’s bad infinity that I wanted to know everything Kierkegaard thought about how bad the oxen left in the ditch of finiteness postscripr about the silly ass in the Christmas song: This is so both for subjective reasons unscientivic the Christian must contend not just with ignorance, but with sin — and for objective reasons: Tomorrow will Be my Dancing Day.
Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Johannes Climacus has so delineated the ethico-religious life that Christianity becomes an intensification of subjectivity and its pathos. Although Johannes Climacus himself seems to completely lack faith, this seems to describe the limit of dispassionate interestedness.
Princeton University Press; Revised ed. Amber rated it really liked it Jan 28, In order to be binding, kierkegaatd have to be internalized by the subject and become a part of the self. But it does arm readers with the tools necessary to start grappling with it, and in fact that is all that an introduction of this kind should do.
Sep 12, Renxiang Liu rated it it was amazing Shelves: Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.